JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 23, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Humberto Nieto Gonzalez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia para solicitar adición de la sentencia
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de adición de la Sentencia T-543/15.

Luego de revisar el memorial y de concretar la pretensión del peticionario, considera la Sala de Revisión que la adición reclamada debe ser RECHAZADA, toda vez que no fue presentada en el término de ejecutoria dispuesto en el artículo 238 del Código General del Proceso.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR la solicitud interpuesta como "aclaración, corrección y adición" presentada por el apoderado judicial del señor Humberto Nieto González en contra de la sentencia T-543 de 2015, con fundamento en las consideraciones expuestas en la presente providencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR la presente providencia al peticionario, con la advertencia que contra esta decisión no procede ningún recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.